Hate Registry for Students Secretly Targets Parents
March 14th, 2010 by David Dansker
Teachers in England are now required to record instances when racist or homophobic words are used at school and initiate a file on students who use them in a hate register. This requirement is for students aged five and up. Once initiated, the file will be maintained though secondary school. This rule must be complied with whether the child knows the meaning of the words or not. Use of the word “gay” would land a child on the hate registry because that word is often used to denote something inferior and less desirable, and this is the actual reason behind the registry.1 Although the government claims its about bullying, it’s really about something else. Students who discriminate between the practice of homosexuality and heterosexuality and conclude God’s design is to be preferred are being targeted for remediation by the state. They must be taught to believe that both sexual behaviors are equal, and it follows that they don’t graduate until they demonstrate that they have successfully learned the lesson.
Insidious as it is, the reach of the hate registry won’t end there because there is second hidden reason for the database. The database provides government with illegal access into private homes and families to survey attitudes and beliefs. They will use the information they force the teachers to collect to assess parents’ compliance with desired political teaching at home, and they will be able to target those who don’t meet government standards for mandatory parenting classes. Failure to attend these classes may result in the state taking custody of the children to give them a proper education. It’s coming. The evolution of the word “homophobic” demonstrates the process.
1. Ryan Kisiel and Steve Doughty, “Pupils aged five on hate register: Teachers must log playground taunts for Government database,” MailOnline, March 4, 2010.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255264/Pupils-aged-hate-register-Teachers-log-playground-taunts-Government-database.html#ixzz0hD7DHmdN
An estimated 500 Christians, mostly women and children, butchered with machetes as soldiers delay assistance for two hours in Nigeria. Witnesses describe victims were caught in fish nets and animal traps before being hacked to death by Muslims in the three-hour period on Sunday. Reports claim Muslim village residents warned in advance to escape by text messages. The murderers chanted “Allah is the greatest” in Arabic as the hymn accompaniment to the exercise of their religion of peace.1 This is Islam, and the engine of its violence is
The majority of wind turbines used to build a Texas wind energy project are scheduled to be manufactured in China. The $1.4 billion project is made possible by stimulus money which is U.S. taxpayer money that was supposed to go towards stimulating the U.S. economy, and not the Chinese economy. Upon learning of this misappropriation of U.S. tax dollars, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat, New York, has requested a moratorium on spending the money until legislation can be written to stop the flow of stimulus money to foreign countries. Schumer wrote to Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy, that “The idea that stimulus funds would be used to create jobs overseas is quite troubling.”1 In a lame attempt to mollify the Senator, Chu wrote back that the “installation jobs” would be created in America.2 Those American jobs, however, compared to high-skilled manufacturing positions and training, are of far less value in terms of worth and future careers. Obama routinely claims that green jobs are America’s economic future, but any expenditure of American tax dollars to bolster Chinese manufacturing capabilities which at the same time reduces American manufacturing infrastructure to little more than an army of cable installers is un-American.
The English government is spending approximately $92 million dollars to purchase carbon credits as a consequence of surpassing their CO2 emissions cap. The Certified Emissions Reduction (CER) credits will be brokered by Barclays, JP Morgan and company who will earn about $13 million in fee for the transaction.1 The CER program is run by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and England is forced to pay this emissions fine because they are a signatory to the Kyoto climate treaty. In addition to making bankers richer, the millions of taxpayer dollars go from the pockets of England’s taxpayers to the pockets of corporations in China and India. What England gets in return for all that money is nothing, unless you count the feeling some global warming theorists get for believing they are saving the planet from anthropogenic global warming; which, as Climategate has revealed, is still nothing. America would suffer nearly the same fate as England if we let cap-and-trade legislation pass into law. Eventually, every economy tied to the UN style scam will collapse. Even if Englishmen came to their senses tomorrow and somehow bailed out of the UN’s global warming hoax, they will have as much luck getting their money back as they would chasing a postage stamp in a hurricane.
The Obamacare system currently in use in England shows patients routinely go without food and drink and bathing in hospitals due to budget constraints. Care Quality Commission and Health Department regulators report that as many as 1200 patients who died exceeded those expected from 2005 to 2008. This figure is probably based on records indicating the reasons for admissions, and what the probable outcomes should have been after treating those aliments in a hospital with reasonable standards of care. Obviously, those standards were far from met in a hospital where “some lay in soiled sheets that relatives had to take home to wash, others developed infections or had falls, occasionally fatal,” and where “the attitude of some nurses ‘left a lot to be desired’.”1 Thus far, 400 deaths as Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation have been attributed to substandard treatment described as “appalling” in the TimesOnline.2 Well, bad news first, now the good news. Everyone has access to
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), working closely with the Obama administration, declared last December that green house gases, including carbon dioxide, are dangerous to human health. This gives the EPA the ability to act alone in setting emission standards that would begin to strangle industry and send America’s economic downturn into a complete nose-dive. Obama is threatening to turn the EPA lose to do just that if he doesn’t get his cap-and-tread legislation from congress which will virtually do the same thing. This ‘damned if you do, and damned if you don’t’ alternative, coupled with the exposure of the global warming hoax still unraveling in the press, has finally prompted states to take action in court. Texas has filed a petition in federal court to challenge the EPA’s authority, and the state of Virginia has done the same. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli noted that the anticipated action of the EPA would put a “staggering burden” on Virginians.1 He’s right. That’s what the EPA wants to do, and that is what Obama wants to do, and they need to be fought until they stagger out of the ring and retire.
The Dalia Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibet, was received by President Obama at the White House on February 18, but accommodations were made to appease the Chinese government. They don’t like the spiritual leader of Tibet. That is because they don’t like Tibet being called Tibet, but would rather it be referred to as more of China. Nevertheless, if the President of the United States is going to see the guy, see the guy in a manner that upholds the dignity of the Presidency, and the White House. The president should not cave in to the Chinese government’s pressure not to recognize the Dalia Lama, and therefore see him on the down-low, and then slip the poor old guy out the back door of the White House in his bath robe and slippers (uh, strike that, he always dresses that way). Very unPresidential, but maybe Obama bowed really extra low to the Lama to make up for it.
Large energy companies that have been reaching back to cover their behinds, have recently reached back and found their spines. ConocoPhillips, the third largest integrated energy company in America, and BP, the largest oil company in Europe, bailed out of United States Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) on Tuesday. The common reason, as BP puts it, is “to spend time addressing the issues that impact our shareholders and consumers.”1 Their involvement in USCAP, organized in 2007, was to cooperate with governments in seeking ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but they have suddenly lost faith in the legislation that squeaked through the House, but is now stalled-out in the Senate. The reason the cap-and-trade bill has run out of gas is because the jig is up. The global warming hoax is unraveling so fast that it’s created its own vortex. The most recent conspirator to get sucked off the stage is U.N. climate chief Yvo de Boer. Dr. Boer announced on Thursday that he has quit, and will be quietly phasing himself out until his disappears in July. In a dispensation of poetic justice, things just got too hot for Boer. Now, that’s warming we can appreciate.
Last week Amy Bishop, a biology professor at University of Alabama, was arrested for the fatal shootings of three other professors. Reports are now surfacing that indicate Bishop also killed her brother in 1986 by shooting him. While not diminishing the scope of this tragedy, the question has been put as to why the above headline is not being used in the media for reporting on this story.1 If it were a Baptist, Fundamentalist, or Christian, who was involved; some are of the opinion that these appellations would have been included ad nauseam in the news. Yet, perhaps there is a slight compliment in this disparity. Absent a faith in the Creator, Evolutionists may not be held to a very high standard of morality in the public mind. One random chance life-form randomly took another out of the evolutionary soup. There is nothing sacred about the life-forms, in the evolutionary scheme of things, and nothing wrong with chance; which is to be celebrated as the acceptable explanation for all things.
Phil Jones, Former director of climate research at University of East Anglia, has been suicidal over the reaction to his emails that were published showing his manipulation of data in order to support global warming theory. Jones also lamented that he lacked public relations skill that could have helped him to weather the scandal.1 No one in their right mind would wish Jones to take his life. The only hope serious people have is that he would end his support for the failed theory of global warming. It would be the honest thing to do. And this word of advice: repentance will take you much further than PR skills.
Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is refusing to apologize.1 The issue this time is a factual error in the Panel’s 2007 report claiming that the Himalayan glaciers were very likely to melt as a result of global warming by 2035. It turns out the information cited in the report actually came from observations made by some hikers, and a school paper writing by a geography student. Dr. Pachauri said he can’t be held responsible for every word in the 3,000 page report. That’s alright. Many of us are refusing to apologizing for correctly identifying global warming theory as nothing more than a socialist plan to redistribute wealth under false pretenses held together by conspiracies; because we’re not responsible for global warming.
The Air Force Academy in Colorado is about to dedicate a Wiccan prayer circle made of boulders. Finally “Earth-centered cadets,” as the pagans on the base refer to themselves, will have a place to worship.1 If they only realized how theologically accurate the term that they have chosen for themselves really is.